^up |
|
|
What's
at Stake and Why Are These Actions Important?
|
- Don't
Let Fake Phone Consumer Groups Control the USF Agenda.
- Don't
Let These Group RAISE RATES, TAX VOIP!
- Investigate
how the USF has become a massive Corporate subsidy.
- Investigate
the Control Over the FCC Consumer Advisory Committee
Two
weeks ago, the "KeepUSF
Fair Coalition" (Universal Service Fund) congratulated
FCC Commissioner Martin on his new appointment to Chairman and suggested
increasing Universal Service Fund up to 40% and adding taxes to
Voice over the Internet" (VOIP). They claim that this would
be good for Seniors, Hispanics, low-income families, and consumers.
"Keep
Universal Service Fair Coalition" is another Bell (SBC, Verizon
and BellSouth) skunkworks campaign. The group is mainly comprised
of astroturf and co-oped groups funded by the Bell companies and
are being coordinated by Issue
Dynamics and Sam Simon, to push the Bell monopoly
agenda. In this case, this group is pushing an anti-customer position
on the Universal Service Fund -- Raise this tax and put it on new
services, including VOIP. (This group includes TRAC,
Alliance for Public Technology,
American Association Of People With Disabilities, World Institute
On Disability, League Of United Latin American Citizens, the Gray
Panthers, and
others.)
Using coopted
and astro-turf groups, over ther last decade they have taken away
your voice at the FCC, in Congress, and in the media, harming everything
from broadband and the Internet, the wiring of municipalities, the
offering of innovative services, such as VOIP, to increasing the
charges on your phone bill and harming competition.
Teletruth
believes that the Universal Service Fund has turned into an out-of-control
phone company corporate subsidy and needs to be investigated. We're
for wiring schools, not billion dollar corporate give-aways and
new taxes, especially on new services, such as VOIP.
|
|
|
LEARN
ABOUT THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND'S CORPORATE SUBSIDIES
|
|
Here's Some Details
-
The
Unversal Service Fund is a tax on interstate wireline and wireless
services, and represents a number of different funds including
the Erate (wiring of schools and libraries), the High-Cost Fund,
Lifeline, and other funds.
-
The
Universal Service Fund has increased from 3.9% on long distance
services in 1999 to 11.1% in 2005, a 185% increase.
-
The
largest part of this fund is NOT for wiring of schools and libraries,
but to 'High-Cost Funds", which are corporate subsidies
to the phone companies. The High Cost Fund represents over 60%
of the total collected, doubling from $1.7 in 1999 to $3.4 billion
in 2004. --- and growing.
-
These
funds are NOT going to corporations that need this money. Many
of the phone companies receiving funds have 55% profit margins
(EBITDA), in a large part. from this High Cost fund.
-
Declining
Costs: The costs to offer local service has continued to drop
over the last 5 years. The USF increases have been against a
backdrop of construction cuts, down 50%, and employees-per-line
plummetting 65% since 1984.
-
Double-Quintuple
Taxation? Many states have also added statewide High-cost funds,
Erates, Lifeline services and other services covered under the
federal program, and NO ONE HAS EXAMINED THESE PROFITS or multiple
funds!
-
Major
Fraud and Lack of Audits -- Everyone from the FCC Attorney General
and other regulators are finding Erate fraud, a lack of audits,
as well as large profits to companies that don't need the money
|
|
Teletruth
Files A Complaint Over The Industry's Role on the FCC Consumer Advisory
Committee.
|
|
Who
controls the FCC? It certainly isn't you, the customer. Teletruth
today filed a complaint about the FCC Consumer Advisory Committee
(CAC) because after serving on it for two years, it is clear
that industry interests, and not customers, are in charge .
I repeat, the industry is in charge of the Committee that is
dedicated to consumers having a voice at the FCC.
For
example, you still can't read your phone bill right? Wasn't
the FCC supposed to make phone bills readable with "Truth-in-Billing"?
Or when the phone, cable or media companies all want to merge,
why did the FCC pursue a course to let them get larger and decrease
choices?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
In Washington,
there are lots of groups, such as Issue Dynamics, Alliance for Public
Technology, (APT), that claim to represent you --- and are on the
Consumer Advisory Committee, but are paid for by Verizon and SBC.
Read more
|
|
|
Take
Action: |
|
DON'T
BE ONE OF THE DISCONNECTED
|
1. |
Talking
Points!
|
|
Investigate
Teletruth's claims about Skunkworks and the Universal Service Fund
- Investigate USF Charges,
including the High Cost Fund.
- Why has the USF gone
up when the costs of service keeps decreasing?
- Why has this Fund
gone up 185% in 5 years?
- Why are all these
fake groups not being exposed and many are on the FCC Consumer
Advisory Committee?
Start
an Investigation Immediately!
|
3. |
Write
The FCC!
|
|
Write
the Commissioners --- Tell them you will not accept the phone
and media companies control.
NOTE:
Powell has left the FCC.Make the other Commissioners care about
the Public Interest.
|
4. |
Contact
the Press!
|
|
Contact the Press: Write
and tell them to start investigating who controls the FCC and the
Country's agenda.
They're always talking
about holding regulators accountable. Isn't time someone exposed
the truth about who controls the FCC' agenda?
|
|
|
|
MORE
LINKS ON KEEP USF FAIR AND USF
|
|
|